Whether a sentence is manifestly erroneous because the Doctrine of Amelioration allows for that sentence to be controlled by a newly amended version of a criminal statute, enacted before the sentence was imposed, rather than the older statutory provisions; and

Whether such sentence, being manifestly erroneous — as it would violate the statutory authority that governs it — may be challenged at any time, because it new cannot be waived and, hence, is not subject to the limiting Doctrine of Res Judicata ?

Whether a sentence is manifestly erroneous because the Doctrine of Amelioration allows for that sentence to be controlled by a newly amended version of a criminal statute, enacted before the sentence was imposed, rather than the older statutory provisions