No. 19-8424

José Yeyille v. Miami-Dade County Public Schools, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-05-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure coppedge-v-united-states disputed-facts district-court-review due-process in-forma-pauperis legal-conclusions standing summary-disposition
Key Terms:
Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the district court appropriately resolved genuine issues of
disputed facts; correctly applied legal conclusions; and provided any statement
explaining its dismissal of the Complaint that would facilitate any remotely
intelligent appellate review """. Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 34 (1992).cut

2. Whether the summary disposition by the Eleventh Circuit Court of
Appeals of Petitioner 's Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis and Fed. R. App.
P. 24(a)(5) Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was justified under Coppedge v.
United States , 369 U.S. 438 (1962) and Cruz v. Hauck , 404 U.S. 59 (1971).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court appropriately resolved genuine issues of disputed facts; correctly applied legal conclusions; and provided any statement explaining its dismissal of the Complaint that would facilitate any remotely 'intelligent appellate review'

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-04-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 8, 2020)

Attorneys

José Yeyille
Jose Yeyille — Petitioner