No. 19-842
Mark J. Schwartz v. Clark County, Nevada, et al.
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights district-court-discretion federal-jurisdiction judicial-bias qualified-immunity section-1983 seniority-manipulation state-law supplemental-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-03-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
A. Does the di strict court abuse i ts discreti on
when i t fails to di fferenti ate between federal
and state l aw when exerci sing its authori ty
over state l aws cl aims pursuant to 28 U .S.C.
§1367?
B. Can del ayed generi c jury i nstructi on actual ly
cure judi cial bias?
C. Does a supervi sor vi olate §1983 when they
abuse thei r authori ty to mani pulate the
seniority ranki ngs to effectuate the l ayoff of a
targeted i ndividual based upon the
supervi sor's personal prejudi ce?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the district court abuse its discretion when it fails to differentiate between federal and state law claims under 28 U.S.C. §1367?
Docket Entries
2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2019-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Mark Schwartz
Mary F. Chapman — Law Office of Mary F. Chapman, Ltd., Petitioner