1. In resorting to felonious criminal syndication against The Petitioner (hereafter T.P.) as well as complete disregard for all applicable law in lieu of arbitrary inclinations do the action of judge Ann Bailey-Smith (hereafter A.B.S.) warrant a reversal of the conviction against T.P. and a remand for a dismissal of the prosecution against T.P. with prejudice?

2. In resorting to felonious criminal syndication against T.P. in pursuit of a wrongful and unlawful Maximum sentence conviction as well as complete disregard for the law and its ethical Standards do the actions of the Jefferson County Commonwealth's Attorney's Office, Louisville Metro Police Department, and culpable Commonwealth's Attorney's Office Witnesses (hereafter A.O.P.) warrant a reversal of the conviction against T.P. and a remand for a dismissal of the prosecution against T.P. with prejudice?

3. In resorting to felonious criminal syndication actions against T.P. as well as complete disregard For all applicable l.aw and ethical standards do the actions of the two (2) court appointed defense attorneys (hereafter C.A.A.) Erin Melchior (hereafter E.M.) and Robert Gaurnieri (hereafter R.G.) warrant a reversal of the conviction against T.P. and a remand for a dismissal of The prosecution against T.P. with prejudice?

4. To this rendition of the Most High and Honorable United States Supreme Court, in America is it tolerable for corrupt government agents to collude to carry-out unabashed acts of criminal syndication against citizens in lieu of legitimate judicial functions?

5. Was T.P. denied his Constitutional Right to a direct appeal of his conviction and representation by an attorney upon direct appeal by an unscrupulous court appointed attorney (hereafter also C.A.A.), Erin Hoffman-Yang (hereafter E.H.), high-jacking T.P.'s direct appeal away from him in

Question not identified