Pursuant to Pa CSA 4342(e) 42 U.S 666 Common Pleas judge Kelly, Domestic Relations has authority to obtain personal jurisdiction over non residence of the state of Pennsylvania, by showing service of process on the defendant, declaring him father of child by default, for refusal to take a paternity, third circuit affirms that these acts are judicial in nature, The question here is whether statues governing this ruling are legal precedent, constitutional, did judge Kelly act in clear absent of jurisdiction, is she, domestic relations, immune from suit

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims alleging violations of the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause