No. 19-8363
Daniel R. McClain v. Kenneth Sharp, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment-rights habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-counsel post-conviction-relief prison-conditions
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Copyright
HabeasCorpus Copyright
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Why are alleged time limits excuses berg erroneaus le misused to disrtss abunclant matlérs of reversable error, and promote extraordinary asurpation ?
2) What precisely constitutes Unallenable
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated due to the deprivation of adequate access to the courts and lack of properly trained legal assistance
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-14
Waiver of right of respondent Kenneth Sharp, Warden to respond filed.
2020-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 26, 2020)
Attorneys
Daniel R. McClain
Daniel R. McClain — Petitioner
Kenneth Sharp, Warden
Melody Jane Brown — South Carolina Attorney General's Office, Respondent