Is it lawful to have a witness testify in a case where they have NO Direct knowledge of the facts?

Can a State Court Joinder of Dissimilar charges, where Acts alleged are significantly different from the original set of facts?

A Court abuses its discretion when its ruling is based on an erroneous view of the law, or on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence. therefore, Can a Court allow witness or victims to testify to different facts in seperate cases, where witness was NOT "witness thereto" ?

It is considered "Harmless Error" to convict a person while failing to consider Exculpatory evidence that can exonerate him?

Was it Constitutional Error to Deny admission of Defendants witness' Affidavit & Declaration, which could exonerate Defendant ?

Was it Harmless Error to omit Defendant's witnesses Affidavit from Jury consideration ?

Under State Law, can a witness be both "Awake and half asleep" for the purpose of finding of guilt, or probable cause ?

Was joinder of the dissimilar offenses proper ?

Was there insufficient evidence to convict the Defendant as pertains to the Solicitation & Conspiracy charges ?

Question not identified