No. 19-8347
IFP
Tags: due-process exigent-circumstances extrinsic-fraud Fourth-Amendment jurisdiction motion-to-vacate probable-cause property-rights standing void-judgment warrantless-search
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-06-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
I.Did the Sapreme Court of Virginia have
jurisdiction to adjudicate the claims of
Daniels' Motion to Vacate, based upon
extrinsic Frand, and Could be attacked
in any court at any time?
2. Was Daniels denied his Fifth and fourteenth
Amendments to the United states Constitution's
right to due process when the Supreme Court
of Virginia and the Circnit Court of Henrico,
Virginia refused to adjudicate Daniel's
Motion to Vacate void Judgment?
3. Did the affidavit for search warrant in
Daniels case establish probable cause
for search of his property, which led to
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Supreme Court of Virginia have jurisdiction to adjudicate the claims of Daniels' Motion to Vacate, based upon extrinsic fraud, and could it be stacked in any court at any time?
Docket Entries
2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-04-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 26, 2020)
Attorneys
Joseph A. Daniels
Joseph A. Daniels — Petitioner