No. 19-8328

Adam Strege v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2020-04-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-remedy civil-procedure discovery due-process forced-medication ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-discretion mandamus pro-se standing
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-05-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

Is it abuse of discretion the First Circuit Court Denied Mandamus because the District Court could respond but never has?

Is Mandamus available because Adam Strege demonstrate that he is unable to attain relief he seeks within the ongoing proceedings the District Court Judge has 100% never responded to all Adam Strege Pro Se Motions and the Magistrate 100% only denied Judge Recusal and granted a Forced Medication Motion the Public Defender enter 5/16/2019 Adam 2nd day ever in a Federal Detention Center and Adam has no Feloney Convictions?

Mandamus for the Evidence of the Social Security ALJ ODAR Phone Call Transcripts because the FBI arrested Adam for making a Phone Call to the Social Security ALJ Office phone call Transcripts will 100% prove that Adam did not threaten anyone?

What if the Magistrate Judge and District Court Judge 100% dont respond to all my Pro Se Motions in 10 Years the First Circuit will respond they Still Could Spend 20 years in Courts that will never consider one Precedent i write?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it an abuse of discretion for the First Circuit Court to deny mandamus because the District Court could respond but never has?

Docket Entries

2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 22, 2020)

Attorneys

Adam Strege
Adam Strege — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent