No. 19-8323
William George Coodey v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: consent criminal-procedure dna-evidence dna-testing due-process factual-innocence jackson-v-virginia rape sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether DNA testing that would undermine an alleged rape victim's testimony denying consent to sexual intercourse would create sufficient uncertainty of the verdict as to constitute a claim under Jackson v. Virginia or factual innocence.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether DNA testing that would undermine an alleged rape victim's testimony denying consent to sexual intercourse would create sufficient uncertainty of the verdict as to constitute a claim under Jackson v. Virginia or factual innocence
Docket Entries
2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 21, 2020)
Attorneys
William George Coodey
William George Coodey — Petitioner