No. 19-8322
Joseph Augustus Dixon v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
"Whether the U.S. District Court and the Eleventh Circuit of Appeals, have abused their discretion by failing to accept Petitioner's timely amended § 2254 Federal Habeas Corpus, before the courts made its final adjudication see, In Re Jermaine Stevenson, 889 F.3d 308 (6th Cir. 2018K "Citing Clark v. U.S.. 764 F.3d 653, 658 (6th Cir. 2014); Easley v, Cromartie. 121 S. Ct. 1452, N. [4] (2000)? "
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-18
Waiver of right of respondent Inch, Sec., FL DOC, et al. to respond filed.
2020-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Inch, Sec., FL DOC, et al.
Joseph Augustus Dixon
Joseph A. Dixon — Petitioner