1. Is a Parties right to raise an absolute a/identiam. PYimleae tontaent UP0Y1 Whether bY evidence ?

2. bots -the. doctrine thaba district Court must decline exercising supplemental jurisdiction over a prisoners state law claims when; -the, federal claims have been dismissed violative of frit Ewhth ; Arriendrnenbo froscwtAon a^ain^L-the. imposition of excessive fines '?

3. boes the doctrine,-that a district court must decline fcXercim &UPPlementa\ jurisdiction over a Prisoners etate law claims ulhtn the federal claims ha\le been dismissed Substanhalk depart-from this Courts Prior holding that such a decision should be. based "values of iudtcial eConorntjConVenieiue ,•fairness,and eomibt "?

4 Is a ddbnct courts dismissal of a PYo se plainhff rs Complaint at the Screening Phasedbr failure, to state a claim without leave to amend a substantial departure froYti. this Courts decision in Kleitdfe \t and/or Rule IhtaXhto of the federal Rules of Cm I Mtdure 7Uftn Uidharns

Whether the party seeking to raise the possessory evidence privilege has an absolute evidentiary privilege