Lazaro Candelaria v. United States
1) Whether the First Step Act of U.S. in his Title 21 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(1) motion.
2) Whether CounselSenate Bill 756, applies to the Petitioner, ineffective for failing to object to Petitioner's prior convictions as too remote in time to be considered at sentencing.was
3) Whether Counsel was ineffective for not requesting Petitioner's Shepard v. United States 544 U.S. 13, 26 (2005), Shepard documentation, and whether the government prejudiced Petitioner for not producing these documents at Petitioner's original sentencing in violation of Canty F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2009).
4) Whether Counsel was ineffective for not challenging Petitioner's prior convictions to the lower courts.
5) Whether Counsel ineffective for promising the Petitioner a 60 month sentence, but when Petitionerv. United States 570 was sentenced, he received 13 years in a federal prison, based on Counsel's breach of plea. Whether Petitioner's plea was involuntary, unintelligent and unknowing.was
Whether the First Step Act of U.S. Senate Bill 756 applies to the Petitioner