1. Petitioner's question on U.S. Courts refusal to provide him due process review of his 2016 rights and liberty interests under well established federal laws via this courts holdings and other federal court holding(s), his 5th and 14th amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution, presents important issues that extends far beyond U.S. constitutional liberty interests and rights of parties in this very unique and interesting case when the Petitioner is further incarcerated via application of invalid law to his criminal conduct, fraud contributes to denial of said due process review to be free of imprisonment after 3/12/2016 via lesser ODOC custody of leave and to petition in two year intervals for a change in his confinement via mandatory language in state statute, specific language in administrative rule. Can a U.S. Citizens, Petitioner, be denied U.S. Constitutional rights by way of fraud and or by an the unlawful extension of authority via legal fiction?

2. Do jurists of reason in this court hold lawful authority to review this unique and interesting question on U.S. Courts refusal to provide Petitioner due process review of his 2016 rights and liberty interests via this courts holdings, well established federal laws,Petitioner's 5th and 14th amendment rights under U.S. Constitution. When important issues extend beyond parties U.S. constitutional rights can this court issue a corrective and lawful order that honors all U.S. Citizens, Petitioner's, Constitutional rights and or explore reasons it may disagree with U.S. court resolution pertaining to the above?

Whether a U.S. citizen can be denied U.S. constitutional rights through fraud or unlawful extension of authority