Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr. v. United States
Did the U.S. District Court violate Pro se Plaintiff's Constitutional Rights of the Judicial Process which requires a review by U.S. Supreme Court?
Where in the U.S. District Court's record did Pro se Plaintiff appeal the INITIAL REPORT and RECOMMENDATION?
Where in the U.S. District Court's record did Pro se Plaintiff object to the INITIAL ORDER?
Where in the U.S. District Court's record did Pro se Plaintiff object to Dismiss by Defendant?
Did U.S. District Court by accepting Defendant's Final argument for a SUMMARY JUDGMENT violate that Pro se Plaintiff saw suggestion box which a violation of DUE PROCESS of U.S. Constitution?
Is it lawful for this Court to accept an ORDER that is not based on FACTS of this COMPLAINT?
Whether the district court's denial of pro se litigant's due process rights requires a writ of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court