No. 19-8295

Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr. v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-04-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction pro-se standing
Latest Conference: 2020-05-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the U.S. District Court violate Pro se Plaintiff's Constitutional Rights of the Judicial Process which requires a review by U.S. Supreme Court?

Where in the U.S. District Court's record did Pro se Plaintiff appeal the INITIAL REPORT and RECOMMENDATION?

Where in the U.S. District Court's record did Pro se Plaintiff object to the INITIAL ORDER?

Where in the U.S. District Court's record did Pro se Plaintiff object to Dismiss by Defendant?

Did U.S. District Court by accepting Defendant's Final argument for a SUMMARY JUDGMENT violate that Pro se Plaintiff saw suggestion box which a violation of DUE PROCESS of U.S. Constitution?

Is it lawful for this Court to accept an ORDER that is not based on FACTS of this COMPLAINT?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court's denial of pro se litigant's due process rights requires a writ of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court

Docket Entries

2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 18, 2020)

Attorneys

Clarence Jenkins
Clarence B. Jenkins Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent