Russell Tinsley v. Sherry Yates, Administrator, Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
WHEATHER THE NEW JERSEY CIVIL COMMITMENT OF MR. TINSLEY WAS A VIOLATION OF THE FAUNTLEROY DOCTRINE; AND/OR JURISDICTION OF THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION (ART. IV, SEC. 1), TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 'S JURISDICTION.
WHETHER THE LOWER COURTS ERRED AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION FOR DENYING MR. TINSLEY 'S REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.
Whether the New Jersey civil commitment of Mr. Tinsley was a violation of the Fauntleroy doctrine and/or jurisdiction of the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution (Art. IV, Sec. 1), to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's jurisdiction