Jesus Jaime Jimenez v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Punishment
1. Did the Fifth Circuit err in not allowing Petitioner his rights to bring his complaint of 'Lack of Jurisdiction', under a §2254 Writ of Habeas Corpus, to which affects Petitioner's substantial rights to be heard, Violating his 5th, 8th, and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution
Whether acting [outside] the statutory window of the C.C.P. 42.12 §8(a), grants the trial court, power to hear Petitioner's case, or whether the 'Lack of Jurisdiction' makes his sentence/conviction Void — under the statutory rule, the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and Laws of these United States.
2. There is an important question of Federal and State Law, that has not been, but should be settled by this Court when dealing with, when a trial court has authority to act upon a defendant's case, after the court lacked subject matter and/or personal jurisdiction, without violating the defendant's 14th Amendment, to Due Process.
Did the Fifth Circuit err in not allowing Petitioner his rights to bring his complaint of 'Lack of Jurisdiction', under a §2254 Writ of Habeas Corpus, which affects Petitioner's substantial rights to be heard, Violating his 5th, 8th, and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution