No. 19-8278

In Re Levar Lee Anthony Spence

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-04-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: brady-violation due-process exculpatory-evidence fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment sixth-amendment spoliation spoliation-of-evidence writ-of-mandamus
Latest Conference: 2020-06-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit properly refused review and hearing of a "Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment, perse prejudicial, Brady violation concerning spoliation of a documented item of exculpatory evidentiary valve on the premise that the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari?

Whether an evidentiary hearing is REQUIRED on this admittedly destroyed State's evidence documented as search inventory!

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit properly refused review and hearing of Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment, per se prejudicial Brady violation concerning spoliation of documented item of exculpatory evidentiary value

Docket Entries

2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-02-20
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 18, 2020)

Attorneys

Levar Lee Anthony Spence
Levar Spence — Petitioner