I. Mental Incompetency
The law states that no person with mental diseare or defect shall be sentenced
for commission of an offence as long as such incapacity endures. Medical records in
this case provide proof to mental incompetency at the time of sentencing. Therefore,
is it a constitutional violation of due process to had been sentenced while inompetent?

I. Mental Cornpetency Hezring.
The law states that failure to provide a hearing on mental competency when
suffrent doubt exist, deprires a defendant of his due process right to a fair trial.
The record in this case showr sufficent doubt did exist and no hearing was held.
Theretore, is it a constitutinal violation of due process to hod been sentenced
when that doubt did exist and no hearing was held on the issue?

IEI. Conflict Between Court Decsions
Caselaw sets precedence that the Courts must uphold or overrule for due proiess
of law: Caselaw was not upheld oroverruled in the appeals of this case. Therefore,
is it a constitutional violation of due process to be denied sentence reversal when
caselaw has established thit requirement?

I. Due Process of Law
The United States Constitution states that no person shall be deprived of
liberty without due process of law. That process established in law has not
been provided in thiscase and I have been deprived of my liberty.Therefore,
Can this Supreme Court of ourcountry correct that miscarriage of justice?

Is it a constitutional violation of due process to have been sentenced while mentally incompetent?