No. 19-8258
Denver Maxwell Goree, Jr. v. Michigan Parole Board
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: commutation constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection ex-post-facto parole parole-board punishment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities
SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-05-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Petitioner's parole process was unconstitutional where (1) the Michigan Parole Board failed to proceed with a recommendation for commutation in violation of Due Process of Law, and Equal protection under the law, and (2) Whether the Parole Board violated clearly established law set forth in the ex post facto clause by implementing new rules and regulations after Petitioner's prior considerations that caused a significant risk of increase in punishment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's parole process was unconstitutional
Docket Entries
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-04-25
Waiver of right of respondent Michigan Parole Board to respond filed.
2019-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2020)
Attorneys
Denver Maxwell Goree
Denver Maxwell Goree Jr. — Petitioner
Michigan Parole Board
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent