No. 19-8252
Roscoe Chambers v. William Hardy, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
OYtr/odU
ffoiejj
Iws,D uW-W\tr fk(L n«rf iV\H'' n<[
£0JUil fe<W(C0^
0\ l*vX
b^r vtJ) Uktkr
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court can overlook regulations as preempting claims of due process rights
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-16
Waiver of right of respondents William Hardy, et al. to respond filed.
2020-03-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Roscoe Chambers
Roscoe Chambers — Petitioner
William Hardy, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent