Counsel Palledtoistrike a juror coho saidhe couldht hesPaiP; investigate,
4 Plied t-aghe, an oro j ipatory eu/dence . the.and present
verbaiin reading crP IPs charge. * and omitted -from j+ls ujrittencour excu
instructions the statu tog definitions of -the. charged csfi\ense. .
fkt/tioncr* coAstitutiona J night Pair andL Han uounseii .iaJQ.1 ife. 'HJ /a
Impartial jury r
d. 2a it ePP&ctive assistance, not to strike a juror coho states ; _Z
Cant start him an a level playing field because nog oujfe Qnd pretty
'th sexual ohuse ; Jl
Pair tniaU
3. For allegations of juror bias , is the proper remedy a heady in
ujlilch the dependant has the. opportunity to prove, actualhiaS ?
d the. parties disagree,
identity of a Juror u)ho Sold he hod been Sexually c,hused ) so it
uobu/cl be hard to give c, fair trial * should the accused juror he,
questioned about this statement 9much fry entire family ... has exper fan ce.
sexually chased at if So it would he hard toy he him aLOJ u&s
the H. Uhen the record is ambiguous i QA on
« 6ft

5~> srs clue. Peacess, defiled oohen the court- falls to yl
verbahn reading of its chci/ye to tlegury and o mitts the^
statutory definitions of h
uonitn IfiSiracliGOS 9oral me, on
for the chaste offense. from the^auu ■
prejudiced u)hen counsel failed tou'njest/yate and
present exculpatory evj'dafice from eyeuditneSS : tecontc, f/ac\ eufdence
> and medical experts to challenge the, lack o f physical eaidence 9
71 L/hen counsel Pails to intersieuJ and present Petitioners alibi
utiiness , Jobs this prejud
effect] je assistance?£>. Idas Petitioner
the defense, and depriue l him of ice.
S Dolit'

Counsel's failure to strike biased juror,counsel's failure to investigate and present exculpatory evidence,court's failure to provide oral verbatim jury instructions,court's omission of statutory definitions in written instructions