No. 19-823
Susan Pearsall v. Thomas C. Guernsey, DDS
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure consent constitutional-procedure court-intervention due-process judicial-modification legal-consent separation-of-powers settlement-agreement
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether it is unconstitutional for the Court to write, rewrite, modify, or add to a so-called settlement agreement without the consent of the parties it binds.
II. Whether it is unconstitutional for an appellate court, upon review of a trial court's order enforcing a so-called settlement agreement, to not affirm or reverse the so-called settlement agreement as a whole, but to create an alternative version by affirming in part and reversing in part.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it is unconstitutional for the Court to write, rewrite, modify, or add to a so-called settlement agreement without the consent of the parties it binds
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-20
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-08
Waiver of right of respondent Thomas C. Guernsey DDS. to respond filed.
2019-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Susan Pearsall
Susan Pearsall — Petitioner
Thomas C. Guernsey DDS.
Paul Robert Bonfiglio — Cincinnati Insurance Company, Respondent