1. WAS THE SEARCH WARRANT FOR MR. CARRIERS HOME AND COMPUTERS RELYING ON A SINGLE TRANSACTION FROM FOUR YEARS EARLIER BASED UPON STALE INFORMATION AND LACKED PROBABLE CAUSE A VIOLATION TO MR. CARRIERS 4™ AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

2. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN MR. CARRIERS SECOND TRIAL BY REFUSING TO INSTRUCT THE JURY REGARDING THE ACQUITTALS IN MR. CARRIERS FIRST TRIAL CONSITUTE A VIOLATION OF MR. CARRIERS 5™ AND 14™ AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

3. DIDTHE ADMISSION OF THE 150-PAGE "BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS " OF "CHILD MOLESTERS " CONSTITUTED A REVERSIBLE ERROR IN VIOLATION OF MR. CARRIER 'S 6™ AND 14™ AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

Was the search warrant for Mr. Carrier's home and computers relying on a single transaction from four years earlier based upon stale information and lacked probable cause a violation to Mr. Carrier's 4th Amendment rights?