1. Whether receiving inadequate representation at a first
collateral review proceeding that causes the material facts
of an ineffective assistance claim not to be fully developed
triggers the exception of Martinez v. Ryan , 132 S.Ct. 1309
(2012), despite this Honorable Court's ruling in Cullen v.
Pinholster , 563 U.S. 170 (2011) requiring that federal
review be confined to the record that was before the state court?

2. Whether allowing a juror who had been intimidated by
outsiders to remain on the jury is a denial of a fair trial
and a violation of the Sixth Amendment?

3. Whether an attorney's failure to be present for three
days during jury selection procedures constitutes ineffective
assistance of counsel during a crucial stage?

4. Whether the exclusion of all Hispanics jurors but one,
by a State attorney, is a Batson violation?

5. Whether an attorney's failure to advise his client
of the right to testify which prevents the client from
testifying and present his defense still constitutes ineffective
assistance of counsel under precedents of this Honorable Court?

6. Whether Petitioner is entitled to a certificate of
appealability ("COA") pursuant to the ruling of this Honorable
Court in Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759 (2017)?

Whether receiving inadequate representation at a first collateral review proceeding triggers the exception of Martinez v. Ryan