No. 19-8205
IFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence exculpatory-evidence post-conviction prosecutorial-misconduct trial-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER MR. BRUNSON'S RIGHT TO DISCOVER EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE IS STILL ENFORCEABLE (Id. AT 41)?
WHETHER THE STATE GOVERNMENT STILL HAS THE OBLIGATION TO TURN OVER EVIDENCE IN ITS POSSESSION THAT IS BOTH FAVORABLE AND MATERIAL TO MR. BRUNSON'S GUILT OR PUNISHMENT (Id. AT 57)?
WHETHER MR. BRUNSON IS STILL ENTITLED TO HAVE THE CPS FILE REVIEWED BY THE TRIAL COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER IT CONTAINS INFORMATION THAT PROBABLY WOULD HAVE CHANGED THE OUTCOME OF HIS TRIAL? IF IT DOES MUST HE BE GIVEN A NEW TRIAL (Id. AT 58)?
WHETHER RESPONDENTS ARE STILL CONSTITUTIONALLY OBLIGATED TO ENSURE IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL EVIDENCE (Id. AT 58)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether [Mr. Brunson's] right to discover exculpatory evidence is still enforceable
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-03-11
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 7, 2020)
Attorneys
In Re Jonathan E. Brunson
Jonathan E. Brunson — Petitioner