1. Does federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) have an unconstitutionally vague
residual clause, and has the government, District Court, or the Sixth Circuit
Court of Appeals answered this issue?

2. Was defense counsel ineffective for failing to request a Suppression Hearing
regarding the numerous Fourth Amendment violations in the petitioner's case?

3. Was the Fourth Amendment violated when agents used 5% year old fraudulent
"stale" information in order to obtain a search warrant?

4. Was the Fourth Amendment violated when agents seized numerous items of pro
perty that was not criminal/illegal, (i.e. Adult Lingerie), and were not
listed as items to seize, and then later claim that they were seeking the
items but admit that it was not listed on the warrant?

5. Was it a Fourth Amendment violation for agents to demand the petitioner's
cellular phone that was on his person when he was not under arrest?

6. Was the search warrant overboard , and did agents exceed the scope of the
warrant to seek evidence of additional possible unrelated crimes of innocent
conversations when the purpose of the initial, search proved to be unfounded?

7. Were there violations of the Fourth Amendment when the petitioner's vehicle
was unlawfully seized by demanding the vehicle keys from the petitioner's
son, after the petitioner released custody of the vehicle to his son?

8. Were there violations of the Fourth Amendment when agents then drove the
petitioner's vehicle from it properly and legally parked spot, moving it
to within the agents complex and storing the vehicle in an unauthorized
maintenance garage, and then proceeding to search the vehicle under a false
pretense of an inventory search, without a search warrant, in order to
secure and search his.cellular phone for evidence- as agents photos-suggest?

9. Did agents violate the petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights when they refused
to release the vehicle to a licensed drive, did not obtain a search warrant
for 67% hours later, and would hold the petitioner's vehicle for 11 days?

10. Did federal agents present false information in order to obtain a search
warrant from the magistrate judge, and was all this not "FRUIT OF THE
POISONOUS TREE"?

11. Was there a violation of the Fifth and/or Sixth Amendment and the Fourteenth
Amendment of DUE PROCESS by the multiple accounts of prosecutorial misconduct
aridjdeception when the government filed numerous documents with the Courts
that contained absolutely false information and presenting false evidence
at the petitioner's trial?

12. Was the introduction of lingerie as evidence, when it had nothing to do with
the petitioner's criminal trial cause him prejudice and resulted in a
fundamentally unfair trial?

13. Was the introduction of consenting adult women photographed in the lingerie
as evidence a. violation of the petitioner's and the women being photographed
First Amendment rights?

14. Was there prosecutorial misconduct concerning the petitioner's cellular phone
transcripts that had the following:
a) Said tamscripts contained, at minimum, 1169 provable and obvious errors;
b) Said transcripts contained, at least 23 falsely added text which were titled
"deleted";
c) Said transcripts showed text allegedly sent to the petitioner from his
accuser with the date of 1970, when the petitioner was ONLY '8 years old;
his accuser andhher

Does federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) have an unconstitutionally vague residual clause?