1. Must all future or pending proceeding(s) in the Case, Come to a halt if the Jurisdiction of the trial court be decree the issue(s), as called into question is inchoate/stipulated with the Ripeness Doctrine?

2. If the jurisdiction of the trial court to decree the issue is called into question, does the party who seeks the exercise of Jurisdiction in his Favor have the burden or obligation to demonstrate that he/she is the proper party to involve judicial resolution of the dispute before any future proceeding(s) can proceed in the case, including but not limited to the sentencing (phase) as itself?

3. If the jurisdiction of the trial court to decree the issue is called into question can a Sentence (ing) be begun (can) there if imposed or takes place between the party seeking the exercise of Jurisdiction in his Favor satisfies his burden to demonstrate that he/she is the Proper party to invoke resolution of the dispute?

4. If the trial court does not comply with its own practice Book Rules/Codes - namely by passing with Motions to accept of judgment; a challenge does not New (s) of a choice like lack of compliance constitute a violation of Due Process and not or equal protection of the law.

Whether the jurisdiction of the trial court to decide the issue is called into question, and whether the party seeking the exercise of jurisdiction has the burden to demonstrate that they are the proper party to invoke judicial resolution of the dispute before any future proceedings can proceed