No. 19-8180

M. H. v. Indiana Department of Child Services

Lower Court: Indiana
Docketed: 2020-04-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment civil-rights compulsion constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment fundamental-rights parental-rights self-incrimination waiver
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2020-05-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. What are the present-day parameters to any assertion of privilege pursuant to the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution (re: compulsion and waiver)?

II. Whether the Constitutional principles espoused in 5th Amendment are violated when compelled to incriminate oneself in order to successfully complete Court-ordered SOMM program or lose one's fundamental right to raise one's children?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

What are the present-day parameters to any assertion of privilege pursuant to the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution (re: compulsion and waiver)?

Docket Entries

2020-08-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-07-09
DISTRIBUTED.
2020-06-26
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent Indiana Department of Child Services to respond filed.
2020-04-08
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, M. H.
2020-03-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 4, 2020)
2020-02-25
Application (19A786) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until March 29, 2020.
2020-02-19
Application (19A786) to extend further the time from March 2, 2020 to March 29, 2020, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
2020-01-14
Application (19A786) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until March 2, 2020.
2020-01-08
Application (19A786) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 29, 2020 to March 2, 2020, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Indiana Department of Child Services
Stephen Richard Creason — Respondent
M. H.
Nathan Dean HoggattNDH Legal, Petitioner