No. 19-8154

Jody Stamp v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-04-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure disabilities-act disability-accommodations due-process mental-health post-traumatic-stress sentencing sentencing-mitigation
Latest Conference: 2020-05-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

The question presented is should the District
Coust Judge forcloser of a down word
variance be based or the Judges Personal
interpcatation of the Defendants psycholegical
disorder inwhich was represented by the

The question presented is should the
Defendants Ineffective Trial Caunsals
failure to present the District Count Psychological
Reports or recands be forever forclosed due
to the Honorable Appeals Lourts belie F that
the
Disabled Defendants Mental Health
Condition durring the Crime have no
Value or relevance to mitigation.

The question presented is should
the
Honorable Distiict Caunt and Honorable
Appeals Court ignore
a Bonifide Mental
Health Disabled Defendants Mental Health
Crisis Informatios that could Proue
the Defendant was En a crisis cause
in Part, by Negligent Health Care Proxy

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in failing to provide reasonable accommodations and handling of a defendant with ADHD and PTSD

Docket Entries

2020-05-04
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2020)

Attorneys

Jody Stamp
Jody Stamp — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent