No. 19-8151
Michael John Alcocer Roa v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights counsel-denial criminal-procedure critical-stage due-process interlocutory-appeal right-to-counsel sixth-amendment united-states-v-cronic
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does an interlocutory appeal is a critical stage? If yes, does a denial of counsel during an interlocutory appeal constitutes a violation of Sixth Amendment under United States v. Cronic/ 466 U.S. 648, 659 (1984)?
Do pretrial detainees have a constitutional right to get benefit from the prison mailbox rule?
Does the wire fraud statute (18 USSCC . §1343) apply extraterritorially to extraterritorial violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. et seq. )?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does an interlocutory appeal constitute a critical stage, and does denial of counsel during an interlocutory appeal violate the Sixth Amendment under United States v. Cronic?
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2020)
Attorneys
Michael Alcocer Roa
Michael John Alcocer Roa — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent