How is the Equal Protection clause violated against a non-custodial Parent in this Federal Interstate TITLE IV-D Social Security ACT Case?

How is the Due Process Clause violated in this case?

How is the False Claims act violated in this Federal Interstate child support case?

How is the Consumer Protection act clause violated in this TITLE IV-D Social Security Act child support Federal Interstate case violated against the Non-custodial parent?

How is Interstate Commerce Clause violated and Due Process of Law?

Is it a violation of Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution 4th & 5th Amendments when a "Non-controlling" Child Support note from a foreign States Jurisdiction, is Enforced in the Issuing Jurisdiction State and was Deemed where there were No Legal orders to Be Enforced from the Foreign States Jurisdiction, and where Disposable Income, 11,000.00 of Gross Income, All Based on a foreign States Jurisdiction all zero violated Legally Unforced?

What Safeguards must Be put in place and parents Constitutional Rights, Full right To Fair Due Process of Law, Cover, are NOT Applied in Conformity with The United States Constitution on this case?

How Can FAIR Due Process of Law exist in a civil matter of child Support enforcement on appeal, when Court of Appeals & State Supreme Court DO NOT ASSIGN Counsel to an Indigent person who Suffered From Inadequate Counsel in the Lower State Court, and Filed an Appeal Pro-Se litigant?

Whether the Due Process Clause is violated when the federal interstate child support enforcement process under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act does not provide the non-custodial parent with an opportunity to present material evidence