Whether the Tenth Circuit has jurisdiction to consider Denying of plaintiff prisoner in custody of Department of Corrections housed in private prison in violation of Bounds v Smith

The issue presented to the District Court the denial of Law Library by defendants in Violation of O.D.O.C OP 030115 deadline to a prose plaintiff in a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 plaintiff proved by provided documentation the defendants Law Library Supervisor Denied Access once plaintiff filed Doc Request to Staff a system of communication to resolve that denial Ms Patterson wrote a Misconduct based on the fact that plaintiff had filed Complaint in E.D. Civ-19-302-JHP-SPS Counsel in the present case, after the defendants showed retaliatory action to court Bounds v Smith guarantees retaliation would be a First Amendment Violation based on plaintiff Complaint at present conditions of confinement especially when any misconduct threaten plaintiff right to counsel in order to present his case or he would be without any means to provide any support case law, and investigate the crucial facts plaintiff right to represent in accordance established in Bounds v Smith

Whether the Tenth Circuit has jurisdiction to consider denying of plaintiff, prisoner in custody of Department of Corrections, housed in private prison in violation of Bounds v. Smith