THE HONORABLE JUDGE MICHAEL BALD IMPROPERLY IMPOSED CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES WHEN CONCURRENT SENTENCES ARE MANDATED BY THE STATUTE, PETITIONER WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GREAT BODILY HARM, NOT SEVERE BODILY HARM. THE JUDGE ADHERED TO JOEY FINANCE OF GREAT BODILY HARM BUT SUSTAINED ON PETITIONER'S MOTION UNDER CHARLES CONSECUTIVE RATHER THAN CONCURRENT.

Whether concurrent sentences are mandated by statute when the petitioner was found to have caused bodily harm, not severe bodily injury