McDonnell, HI 8 U.S. 558 ( IHTH )y established
prisoners' right 'to present documentary evidence ot
disciplinary hearings. vSmce then , lovuer courts have held
that video serveillance uuas not covered by Wolff 7
*000) hold 1 that it IS * uJill be hencetorth .Wo I f fv.
though they
Did the W'o/ff rljbt to present documentary evidence encompass the ri^bf
ho present v/cfeo evidence y or is this a neuu /eja/ context ?
encompass video evidence y uuould the hearing officer be
that evidence oh the hearing ?if_ Wo/ff did
duty-bound to personally examine
How does anybody knouj with certainty which -Forms of documenfeuy
evidence Wolff did or did oof auhhorize for prisoners ?

Did the Wolff right to present documentary evidence encompass the right to present video evidence?