No. 19-8120
Jarvis Rodrick Thomas v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process equal-protection false-statements fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment liberty-interest
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-04-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was it "unreasonable" to be "seized" in violation of the
Fourth Amendment and re-arrested for the same offense to deprive .
the Petitioner of his Fourteenth Amendment "liberty interest"
after posting bond?
2. Was the Petitioners Fifth Amendment Rights violated when
Federal Prosecutor adopted the States case which deprived the
Petitioner of his Fourteenth Amendment liberty interest, due
process, and equal protection restraining the Petitioner by
using false statement and omissions?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was it unreasonable to be seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment and re-arrested for the same offense to deprive the Petitioner of his Fourteenth Amendment liberty interest after posting bond?
Docket Entries
2020-04-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-04-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Jarvis Rodrick Thomas
Jarvis Rodrick Thomas — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent