1. Whether the Court of Appeals denying Application for Certificate
of Appealability and Petition for Rehearing/Rehearing en Banc is
contrary to this Court's decisions in Henderson v Shinseki,562 U.S
428;Wisconsin Dept. of Corrections v Schacht,524 U.S. 381;
Zadvydas v Davis, 533 U.S. 678. Resulted in a denial of Due Process
when Petitioner was not given opporunity to challenge jurisdiction

2. Whether the Court of Appeals denying Application for Certificate
of Appealability resulted in a denial of Due Process when a
coerced statement was used against Petitioner at his trial which
is contrary to this Court's decisions in Haynes v Washington, 373
U.S. 503; Kaupp v Texas, 538 U.S. 626;Hardy v U.S.,186 U.S. 224;
Mallory v Hogan, 378 U.S. l;Brown v Illinois, 422 U.S. 590.

3. Whether the Court of Appeals denying Application for Certificate
of Appealability resulted in a denial of Due Process when
Petitioner was forced to proceed with unwanted counel contrary to
this Court's decisions in Faretta v California, 442 U.S. 806;
Wiggins v Smith, 539 U.S. 510; Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738.

4. Whether the Court of Appeals denying Application for Certificate
of Applealability resulted in a denial of Due Process when
Petitioner was arrested pretextually and not promptly presented
before a magistrate contrary to this Court's decisions in Mallory
v U.S.,354 U.S. 449; Boyd v U.S., 116 U.S. 616; Ferguson v City of
Charleston, 533 U.S. 67.

whether-the-court-of-appeals-denying-application-for-certificate-of-appealability