No. 19-8093
Jose Passalacqua v. Mike McDonald, Warden
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure due-process habeas-corpus judicial-procedure jury-misconduct motion-standard ninth-circuit rule-60(b) rule-60b scope-of-hearing successive-petition
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-05-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Ninth Circuit Erred In Holding That Petitioner's Rule 60(b) Motion, Was the Equivalent to an Unauthorized Second or Successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Habeas Petition?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit Erred In Holding That Petitioner's Rule 60(b) Motion, Was the Equivalent to an Unauthorized Second or Successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Habeas Petition?
Docket Entries
2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 23, 2020)
2020-01-27
Application (19A823) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 23, 2020.
2020-01-14
Application (19A823) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 23, 2020 to March 23, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Jose Passalacqua
Jose Passalacqua — Petitioner