Vaughn Harris v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, et al.
1. Whether a pretrial prison staff may violate §parelrial Jvisoners M edierl eivil yights Wy oyeler Yo chuse AIM annecesstry Jyjuries b y delap dill clenigh of Hmely prescribed sad foreseen Medier| careb ns L was, Vaughn ente
a, Whether A stale lanl Phat excuses (gelatin) iwlriohts tee oe Anwottted 5 29-20 (bi ) /s cosfihiboint # Or whether Jenn. Code Figo tafed SAF-20- 0S vislafes the Hem 4 S743 and fff Anendueufe othe Mailed Ties Cons, Catan ? .
3. Whether forture puPieled by Metropol iad Nashville and Lpvidson County, Jenmessee go vernment eayloyecsilf Agents ot te Lavidsan Csuuily Seri fr Bice Shel cause Injuries cnivecgsstrily yy pees Pa, prelnitl SeMpinees As proishageall 2 ronstlatiinind case /AW by persois Working uNaér vob rote nine Code VAwsiefed 19-108 violies federn/ Jaw 5,
4, Whether all, paves y} Mancgonhy, ana Loaividled Agenlls and employees ave hable for the uunecessary Zorfave, JupUrves y and abuse wWhlicléd Ke Me, VausHa freely from 20/5 with! 2000 of fadty rhe yes aud apueages Shave sushined thon The geferidnits he bere such Porence 78 my health nud safely Foon the dates sfuledl
Whether the lower court erred in its application of the legal standards for determining standing and ripeness in this case