No. 19-802
David Ehrman v. Cox Communications, Inc., et al.
Tags: citizenship-pleading civil-procedure diversity-jurisdiction domicile federal-jurisdiction notice-of-removal pleading pleading-standards procedural-requirements removal removal-procedure standing
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
To plead diversity of citizenship, is an allegation of an individual's state citizenship made solely on "information and belief" sufficient, or must a party allege facts which, taken as true, would establish an individual's domicile in a state and United States citizenship?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is an allegation of an individual's state citizenship made solely on 'information and belief' sufficient to plead diversity of citizenship?
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-03-04
Reply of petitioner David Ehrman filed.
2020-02-21
Brief of respondents Cox Communications, Inc, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-01-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 21, 2020.
2020-01-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2020 to February 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2020)
Attorneys
Cox Communications, Inc, et al.
Katharine Tracy Van Dusen — Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass LLP, Respondent
David Ehrman
Jamin Samuel Soderstrom — Soderstrom Law PC, Petitioner