Jeremy Fontanez v. J. Coakley, Warden
Does B.O.P. Policy 1315.007 "Legal Activities, Inmates," violate a Federal prisoner's First Amendment Right to reasonable access to the state court, where the policy allows B.O.P. not to provide access to state lay material with state-sentence, trial material arguably which three prisoners ability?
Is the Fourteenth Amendment Right to the equal protection of the laws violated where federal inmate and state inmates are treated different in regards to legal materials made available to them in their respective institutions as a prisoners inability to access the state?
Is 28 U.S.C. 2241 a proper procedural avenue to challenge the Constitutionality of B.O.P. Policy?
Does the policy in 6.0.8 violate a federal prisoner's First Amendment right to reasonable access to the courts, where the policy allows only one hour per week of law library access?