When denial of COA was made in conlusory order without any
precendent to rely on and there exists no sufficient basis for
appellant court to review, was petitioner's ability to appeal
wrongly impeded and was his procedural due process of law vio
lated?

WhenTgrounds on appeal are granted hearing and witnesses
from trial provide testimony, does petitioner then have the
right to confront those witnesses in order to satisfy the
Strickland standard?

Does discretionary review in the interest of justice standard
to substitute counsel leave petitioner vulnerable to a harmful con
flict of interest without any chance for remedy?

Does lost mail, that resulted in untimely filing but was sup
ported by supplemental motion and uncontested affidavit, qualify
as extraordinary circumstances and all for equitable tolling?

When denial of COA was made in conclusory order without any precedent to rely on and there exists no sufficient basis for appellate court to review, was petitioner's ability to appeal wrongly impeded and was his procedural due process of law violated?