I. Whether A Judge' Statements Demonstrating Extreme Bias Against Pit Bull Owners as a Class And Advocating the Elimination of Anyone Involved in Dogfighting Requires Recusal On Constitutional Or Statutory Grounds in an Animal Fighting Case.

II. Whether a Trial Court's Failure to Enquire Whether the Defendant Read and Discussed A Pre-Sentence Report with his Attorney In Violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i)(1)(A) Requires Resentencing Under a Bright Line Rule When Prejudice to a Criminal Defendant Results.

Whether a judge's statements demonstrating extreme bias against pit bull owners as a class and advocating the elimination of anyone involved in dogfighting requires recusal on constitutional or statutory grounds in an animal fighting case