No. 19-7970
Shawnte L. Shade v. Rusty Washburn, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review civil-procedure due-process equitable-tolling habeas-corpus holland-v-florida ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-unconstitutionality statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the Petitioner's statute of limitation was equitably tolled under Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010) in excusing his 92-day delay.
II. Whether the Petitioner's plea was unconstitutional under Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S. Ct. 1709, 23 L. Ed. 2d 274 (1969)
III. Whether the Petitioner's counsels were ineffective under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 690, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984),
IV. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's appeal.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Petitioner's statute of limitation was equitably tolled under Holland v. Florida
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-16
Waiver of right of respondent Rusty Washburn to respond filed.
2020-02-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Rusty Washburn
John Henry Bledsoe III — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent
Shawnte L. Shade
Shawnte L. Shade — Petitioner