WHETHER THE COURT SHOULD GRANT THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ON THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

A) WHETHER OR NOT APPELLANT CAN BE TRIED, CONVICTED, AND VETTED ABOUT A VALID SPECIAL PRESENTMENT, OR AS A TEST?

B) WHETHER OR NOT APPELLANT HAS DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION AS AGAINST A VALID CHARGE, PRESENTMENT, OR INDICTMENT OR SUCH FACT?

C) WHETHER OR NOT A VALID PRESENTMENT CAN BE USED OR SUCH PRESENTMENT OF GEORGIA OUTLAWING FREE SWORN PRESENTMENT OF BAY ATLANTA FIRST COURT INDICTMENT DISTRIBUTION CRIME?

D) WHETHER OR NOT THE STATE OF PRESENTMENT OR WHETHER UPON LAWS IS JUST LEVIED FOR CAPITAL CASE?

E) ONE TRIAL COURT HERE SUBMITTED IN PANDERER, AND IN TO ADVISE PETTING EFFECT COMPLETE UPON A VALID PLEA AND THAT ON JOBE FMEAT?

F) OSAEIPVER PTT OAS LIVI TEL EPH PUUV ESF OF JULY MTD OAS A PROPER AND FINELY PHBE PIG ACTARIS TO OB GA, $/2-7-OO EF, BEG?

G) WHETHER PETITIONER SECURELY DUEL VANT TO ZEULOS 2059, WAN PET PIE VDAT CASE CFEO TH [BZ 0477 2 FAVE YEON SEEN CE, DAT AD UT EXPE UIE S9E?

H) WHETHER THE RESPONDENT'S KNOWINGLY, WELDSEAEY AND INES TI0ILY COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE COURT, BY WROAVING A FAVELA SV CHR/99EG) IG. SED STI ART?

I) WHETHER NWATADE V. OIL FARIA PLOWED ME PERITIA DEX TO BE AHSCAINNDSTRD CNTHKIE OTH £ WN RLARLY SEATED FELONS IN STATE COURT ING GIA BEL TONY PRO CEDDGS ALE PADOPLED?

Question not identified.

Whether the Court should grant the writ of certiorari to review the lower court's decision