No. 19-7959
John Tedesco v. Tammy Ferguson, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al.
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion access-to-courts civil-rights court-access due-process grievance-process injunctive-relief personal-involvement retaliation
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
(A) WAS THE PLAINTIFF ENTITLED TO INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ?
(B) WAS THE PLAINTIFF PROVIDED WITH DUE PROCESS ?
(C) WAS THE PLAINTIFF ALLEGEDLY RETALIATED AGAINST ?
(D) WAS THE PLAINTIFF IMPEDED FROM PRESENTING COGNIZABLE CLAIMS TO THE COURT ?
(E) DID THE PLAINTIFF HAVE ADEQUATE ACCESS TO THE COURTS ?
(F) IS THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS GRIEVANCE PROCESS MEANINGFUL UNDER PLAINTIFF'S CIRCUMSTANCES ?
(G) DID THE DEFENDANTS HAVE PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT IN THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS ?
(H) DID THE DISTRICT COURT ALLEGEDLY ABUSE IT'S DISCRETION IN DISMISSING ALL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the plaintiff entitled to injunctive relief?
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-03-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 13, 2020)
Attorneys
John Tedesco
John Michael Tedesco — Petitioner