I. Has the accused's right of confrontation been converted from the prosecutor's duty under Confrontation Clause into the accused's privilege under the Compulsory Process Clause. Shifts the consequences of adverse - witness no-show from the State to the accused?

II. When, the prosecutor used co-defendant's video statement at crash scene to prove the, motivation for the crime. Is it a violation of the Confrontation Clause, not to provide co-defendant for cross-examination?

III. When, counsel stipulated to admission of co-defendant's guilty plea without defendant allowed the opportunity to cross-examine. Should plain error or harmless error analysis be conducted?

IV. Did counsel knowingly relinquish or abandon his client's confrontation clause right when he may have open the door to waiver over his client's dissent?

Has the accused's right of confrontation been converted from the prosecutor's duty under Confrontation Clause into the accused's privilege under the Compulsory Process Clause. Shifts the consequences of adverse - witness no-show from the State to the accused?