1. Whether District Judge May erred when Dismissing [Petitioners '] "Complaint " as frivolous, in "this " matter? Furthermore, whether [the "Judge" ] considered "record of evidence (document) dated, June 15. 2016 (The "document " which confirmed the wrongful "offset ": and [reset] the statutory time)-, when Dismissing [Petitioners '] "Complaint ", of the Order dated July 23. 2018 : and further Dismissing [Petitioners '] ("IFP") Application, to proceed in the Court of Appeals [based on [Petitioners '] "Complaint " action ; of Order dated August 24. 2018 ?

2. Whether Court of Appeals Judge, [who failed to sign "its" name legibly and failed to provide date of submission of its Judgment (the matters of appropriations which constitutes a legitimate "Order" )]; whether (the "Judge ") considered "all" facts of evidence specifically the (document) dated June 15. 2016 . in "this" case action; when making "its" determination of Dismissing [Petitioners '] "Complaint ", as frivolous by agreeing with lower court Judge May; of [its] "Order "? (The Appeal "Order " which did not provide a date; however, envelope postdate of January 25, 2019 )

3. Additionally, Whether the Court of Appeals "Judges ", erred, when making [its] decision, of the acclaimed "Order " (no submission date appears); however, attached clerks letter /envelope post dated March 13. 2019 : failing to allow Petitioners ' Motion for Summary Judgment/Direct Verdict ("separate case") and request for court appointed attorney; of the matters of "claims ", whereby, [The "case action " filed by (Defendant) Education Management Corp .; in the Bankruptcy Court —State of Delaware, filed on June 29, 2018V . (Parties of Interest) to the Bankruptcy "case action "(State of Delaware), were wrongfully granted priority : in the case matter?

4. Whether District Judge May erred, when mentioning "this " (case action! : as grounds for exercising the "All Writs Act " ? And whether Judge May rightfully appropriated, "its" concerns of addressing the "matters " of claims against "Petitioner "; as stated, I "harassing (her) opponents ' and encroaching the judicial system "]; as it relates to the "case action " (U.S .ex. rel./Townsend v. NLRB), to invoke (grounds of jurisdictions)', in the "Order " dated January 23. 2019 ?

5. Whether District Judge Michael L. Brown (State of Georgia), discern appropriately, concerning "Petitioner Townsends " ("Writ of Certiorari ") docketed July 30, 2019; of his "Order " dated August 16. 2019 ; of ["Petitioner Townsends "case action (priority claim) against Education Management et., al.]; when concluding to Enforce the "All Writs Act " and Dismiss "Townsends "case action ; under the governance, thereof? [The "All Writs Act " which was "ordered " and initiated on January 23, 2019, by District Judge Leigh Martin May (State of Georgia)]

6. Whether any of these "government officials ", conclude appropriately and with consciousness of "Petitioner Townsends "rights, in determination

Whether District Judge May erred in dismissing the petitioner's complaint as frivolous