Whether refusal of California Court of Appeal to vacate a judgment procured by fraud upon the court violated the right to due process of law of the party who was prevented from fully presenting her claim by the fraud.

Where rules of the court provides that oral argument is an indispensable part of a hearing of an appeal, whether there is a violation of due process of law when such oral argument is not provided by the virtue of no effort from the court to hear the arguments and the parties to the appeal are not notified.

Whether refusal of California Court of Appeal to vacate a judgment procured by fraud upon the court violated the right to due-process, civil-procedure, standing