No. 19-792
Vugo, Inc. v. City of New York, New York
Amici (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: central-hudson civil-rights commercial-speech content-based-restrictions content-based-speech first-amendment free-speech reed-v-gilbert reed-v-town-of-gilbert strict-scrutiny
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Securities
FirstAmendment Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-04-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
In Reed v. Town of Gilbert, this Court clarified that content-based restrictions are those that apply to particular speech because of the topic discussed or the idea or message expressed, and reaffirmed that content-based restrictions on speech require strict scrutiny review. Government restrictions on commercial speech that do not apply to non-commercial speech are content-based. Should strict scrutiny review apply in such a challenge?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether strict scrutiny review should apply to government restrictions on commercial speech that do not apply to non-commercial speech
Docket Entries
2020-04-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-04-06
Reply of petitioner Vugo, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2020-03-20
Brief of respondent City of New York in opposition filed.
2020-01-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 20, 2020.
2020-01-21
Brief amici curiae of Goldwater Institute & Cato Institute filed.
2020-01-17
Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.
2020-01-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 21, 2020 to March 20, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 21, 2020)
Attorneys
City of New York
Richard Paul Dearing — New York City Law Department, Respondent
Goldwater Institute & Cato Institute
Jacob H. Huebert — Goldwater institute, Amicus
Pacific Legal Foundation
Daniel Moshe Ortner — Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus
Vugo, Inc.
Jeffrey Michael Schwab — Liberty Justice Center, Petitioner